Automated Utility Structure Design & Fabrication Integration
Automating utility structure design, documentation, and fabrication data—directly from a rule-driven Inventor system.
Workflow Type
CAD & Mfg Integration
Primary Outputs
Models, Drawings, BOMs
Platform
Autodesk Inventor
Downstream
Tekla PowerFab
The Problem
Designing utility poles and structural assemblies involved extensive repetitive modeling, manual drawing creation, and manual preparation of manufacturing data. This led to inconsistent outputs across teams, high rework rates, heavy manpower dependency, and delays that increased project costs and affected delivery schedules.
Constraints & Challenges
- Repetition: Repetitive creation of similar parts, sub-assemblies, and assemblies.
- Documentation: Time-consuming generation of drawings and PDFs.
- Consistency: Inconsistent outputs across teams and projects.
- BOMs: Manual preparation of Bills of Materials for manufacturing.
- Integration: Lack of direct integration between design data and fabrication systems.
- Scalability: Difficulty scaling workflows as project volumes increased.
Our Approach
FDES designed and implemented a custom Autodesk Inventor add-in to automate the complete utility structure design and downstream manufacturing workflow.
- Rule-driven configuration based on structured user inputs.
- Automated generation of parts, sub-assemblies, and assemblies.
- One-click creation of drawings and PDFs using standardized templates.
- Automatic part numbering and hardware placement.
- Generation of manufacturing-ready BOMs.
- Export of structured fabrication data aligned with Tekla PowerFab requirements.
What Was Automated
Integrations
The system seamlessly integrates with the following platforms to ensure end-to-end data flow:
- Autodesk Inventor: Core design and modeling engine.
- Tekla PowerFab: Direct export of fabrication data packages.
- Excel/CSV: Input data handling for batch processing.
Impact
Reduced design-to-fabrication cycle from 2 weeks to 2-3 days per structure type.
Zero fabrication errors caused by drawing inconsistencies — rule-based validation catches mismatches before release.
Freed 60% of engineering time previously spent on repetitive documentation and BOM generation.
Direct data flow from Inventor to fabrication — eliminating manual re-entry into cutting and welding systems.
Before vs After
Related Use Cases
Railway Signaling Drawing Automation
Automated signaling layouts from 3–5 days to 2–4 hours per layout.
Retaining Wall Documentation Automation
Automated engineering calculations from 2–3 days to under 4 hours.
Steel Profile Tool Mapping
Automated tool mapping from 45 minutes per profile to under 5 minutes.
Automating Utility Design All the Way to Fabrication?
Share your workflow and constraints. We’ll tell you what’s automatable, what’s risky, and what a production-grade approach would look like.